This week, online data storage company, Carbonite had some explaining to do when a New York Times article exposed the fact that employees of Carbonite had actually written fake reviews praising the Carbonite backup service and had posted them on Amazon.com back in 2006. If you read the article, you'll learn that a customer who was using the Carbonite service backed up his PC using the service and then had his computer crash. When he went to use the backup to restore his computer, he found that it didn't work and that customer support kept him waiting on hold for an hour. A quick search on product reviews on Amazon led him to discover several suspicious ones all praising Carbonite that were all written around the same time. One review that gave the service 5 stars was published by the VP of Marketing for Carbonite. Yikes!
Fake Reviews Would Be Bad
When the service that you market is responsible for backing up people's computer files and when the tagline under your logo posted at the top of your home page reads "Because your life is on your computer", you want your service to work right every time. You hope no one has to write a review about using your service, because you hope your customers never lose their data and have to recover it. If they do, you certainly want them to have a good experience. What does it say about your service when people discover that your marketing team has been posting fake reviews? Not much. Did you really think no one would figure it out? And, while Carbonite has pulled the fake reviews off of Amazon, the angry customer has all of the screen shots posted online in Picasa where anyone with access to the Internet can still find them.
Carbonite CEO Apologizes
In one story in Xconomy, the writer spoke with Carbonite CEO, David Friend, to get his company’s side of the story. The article reads "He didn’t try to spin or shift blame for the episode: He says it was “totally wrong” for Carbonite staffers Swami Kumaresan and Jonathan Freidin to post positive reviews of Carbonite’s service on Amazon without making it clear that they were Carbonite employees....The Amazon case was an isolated incident. Some people are alleging that this is a pattern of behavior. It isn’t. It was just one thing that happened back when Carbonite had eight employees and there were a bunch of young guys who didn’t know any better…This was just two overenthusiastic employees who decided to post these things on their own. To be honest they thought it was cool.”
The article goes onto say that since January of 2007 Carbonite has had a policy requiring anyone affiliated with the company to disclose that relationship whenever they contribute to blogs or review sites. Really? Might have been nice if that policy had been expanded to take all fake reviews that presiously existed down. A quick Google search might have helped to find out where some of them lived out there on the Internet.
What Did the Carbonite CEO Think Was Going to Happen in the Blogsphere?
What interested me in the Xconomy article was this sentence "But while Friend is apologetic, he’s also a bit miffed about Carbonite’s treatment in the blogosphere over the past couple of days." Hello? Welcome to 2009 and the new world of PR where you can't control your message the way you'd like to online. It's great to come clean and admit a problem, but understand that there are plenty of citizen journalists with blogs and cynical journalists on deadline with a beat to cover who write their own stories, not yours. A quote like that is just catnip for journalists and new marketers.
Given the nature of what Carbonite does with online backup, it's important to note that all these journalists and their readers might be customers. If they're not impressed with the way that you understand how media works today when you respond to a crisis, it's pretty easy for them to switch the method they use to back up their systems -- especially when the cost of your service is about $50/year. And, they have the methods to suggest that others do so as well.
It's also interesting to note as of the writing of this blog entry, that there is no mention of the fake reviews or the company's response to it on the Carbonite website. Seems kind of like putting your head in the sand, doesn't it?
Technorati Profile